- Evaluation methods such as shown above are a first estimate. With experience, you should use the follow modification guides to bid more agressive or conservative than the first estimate suggests.
- Specific hand evaluation approaches, particularly point count modifiers, is a subjective topic with a number of variations used by different bridge players.
- Specific approaches to hand evaluation and the point count range for bids should be chosen to be compatible. As you gain experience, you will need to adjust the specific hand evalaution techniques that you use to improve your bidding results. This fine tuning is generally practical only with a partner with whom you play frequently.
Positive Features
- Very Good: Long unbroken suits
- Very Good: Extra Quick tricks (2 1/2 or more)
- Very Good: Points concentrated in long suits
- Good: unsupported Queens & Jacks in partners suits
- Good: 10's & 9's supporting honor cards
- Good: shortness in unbid suits with long trumps
- Good: broken sequences & lone honors behind suit bidder
Negative Features
- Bad: 4-3-3-3 distribution
- Bad: Less Quick tricks (1 1/2 or less)
- Bad: unsupported Queens & Jacks in unbid suits
- Bad: shortness in partners suits with poor trumps
- Bad: broken sequences & lone honors in front of suit bidder
|
|